Business record to delivery result
Relevant request information can enter Signal and completion context can return where supported.
Signal Delivery Network
Public network / coordinated execution
SIGNAL / API & INTEGRATIONS
Signal’s API is designed to bring delivery capabilities into customer workflows. Signal integrations connect the platforms, systems and delivery capacity that help execute the work.
TWO CONNECTION LAYERS
The names are related, but their jobs are different. The planned Signal API carries customer-facing delivery capability outward into customer-controlled software. Signal integrations bring business systems and execution contributors inward so the work remains coordinated behind one request.
01 / SIGNAL API
Signal is building a customer-facing capability layer so delivery work can begin and remain visible inside customer-controlled software.
SIGNAL API
The Customer Portal is Signal’s first-party experience for creating orders, working with quotes, organizing locations, following progress and returning to proof. Signal is building an open API intended to extend that capability model into systems customers control.
The direction is capability-level, not screen automation. A branch application could prepare a request. An enterprise portal could show customer-appropriate progress. A business record could receive completion evidence. Users would not have to reconstruct the same delivery in another interface.
These domains reflect current platform capabilities and approved API direction. They do not represent published endpoints or general API availability.
API SURFACE / ORDER
The API direction extends the platform order model so confirmed delivery work can remain connected to its source workflow and later result.
EMBEDDED EXPERIENCE
The planned API architecture is intended to support Signal-powered delivery workflows inside an internal operations application, procurement workflow, branch system, enterprise portal or customer ordering experience.
Data and capability access are not the same as an automatic visual clone of Customer Portal. The customer determines how approved capability is presented; Signal supplies the delivery workflow underneath. Attribution, rebranding and implementation boundaries depend on the program.
See the first-party Customer Portal experience →SIGNAL INTEGRATIONS
Integrations solve the other side. They connect the delivery platforms, carriers, brokers, external providers and business systems that may contribute information or execution capability to Signal.
The method varies by program: an API, existing platform integration, structured data exchange, provider-specific connection or governed operating workflow. These categories describe connection models, not a claim that every organization has a live technical integration.
ECOSYSTEM / DELIVERY PLATFORMS
Depending on the platform and program, a connection may carry job, route, assignment, status or proof context.
ORCHESTRATION LAYER
A customer should not have to understand every platform, provider or operating system behind the work. Signal preserves the request, its requirements and documented result while appropriate contributors participate.
Technology makes that record visible. Signal Operations and human oversight keep exceptions, provider coordination and customer communication accountable. Integration does not remove ownership; it gives ownership a connected record.
See how the Signal operating model works →Relevant request information can enter Signal and completion context can return where supported.
The planned API can support a customer-controlled experience without a separate re-entry step.
A supported platform connection can contribute status or proof while Signal preserves the customer view.
Capacity sources may vary by program while the customer’s delivery remains connected.
INFORMATION FLOW
A useful delivery integration does more than send an address. It carries requirements into execution, interprets material events against the request and returns the appropriate result to the customer record.
INFORMATION FLOW / REQUEST
Request details enter with enough structure to preserve the route, shipment, requirements and schedule.
DestinationUNCHANGED
ScheduleUNCHANGED
Receiving instructionsDock 04
RequirementsUNCHANGED
DestinationUNCHANGED
ScheduleUNCHANGED
Receiving instructionsSouth receiving
RequirementsUNCHANGED
CHANGES AND EXCEPTIONS
Receiving instructions, contacts, locations and schedules can change after creation. Integration design determines which changes can move, which require review and when updated context becomes authoritative.
Where supported, relevant systems can receive the current agreed information. If an external connection is delayed, unavailable or incomplete, the design should identify the authoritative record, expose the exception and define recovery. Real-time synchronization and automatic recovery are not assumed.
IMPLEMENTATION MODEL
A practical integration conversation begins with the workflow and people responsible for it. Systems and methods follow after information, ownership and exception paths are understood.
No single connection method fits every program. These stages give operations leaders, product teams and technical evaluators a shared design language without pretending public API documentation already exists.
01 / OPERATING WORKFLOW
Start with the operating handoff, not a preferred technology.
Customer, provider and operational boundaries determine what each participant receives.
The implementation determines whether a customer system, Signal or an execution system owns relevant context.
Define visibility, recovery and the authoritative record when a system is delayed or incomplete.
Relevant status can return without exposing provider selection, administration or economics.
API & INTEGRATIONS FAQ
Signal’s API is the customer-facing capability layer being designed to place Signal delivery functionality inside customer systems and experiences. Signal integrations connect the systems and execution ecosystem around Signal, including delivery platforms, carriers, brokers, providers, ERPs and other operating systems. A program may use one or both.
Signal is building the open API around the same delivery capability model used by the Signal platform. Current integration work is scoped around the customer’s systems, workflow and program requirements. If you are evaluating an embedded or API-driven workflow, talk with Signal about the required capabilities and implementation path.
The direction includes request, quote, order, location, customer-appropriate status and proof capabilities. The exact surface, sequencing and availability will be determined as the API is developed; this page is an architectural overview, not a public specification.
That is a core direction for the planned API. The intent is to make delivery capabilities available inside customer-controlled applications and operating workflows. The implementation would define the exposed capabilities, authorization and surrounding experience.
Signal is designing toward white-labeled customer experiences in which Signal-powered delivery workflow can sit beneath a customer-controlled interface. This does not imply an unrestricted rebrand, a finished widget or general availability today. Boundaries depend on the program.
Signal can evaluate ERP and business-system connectivity around the specific workflow. Connections may exchange request, customer, location, reference, status or completion context. The supported method depends on the system, authorized data and program requirements; universal compatibility is not implied.
A delivery platform can be part of the execution architecture where the platform and program support an appropriate connection. The exchange may involve job context, status, exceptions or proof. Signal maps responsibilities and customer-safe information rather than assuming every platform uses the same method.
Connections vary. Some may use APIs or platform integrations; others may use structured exchange, provider-specific connections or governed operational workflows. A category does not mean every organization has a live technical integration with Signal.
No. The right connection may be an API, an existing integration, structured exchange or an operating process supported by technology. The decision begins with where the request originates, what must move and which system retains the authoritative record.
Where supported, relevant status and available proof can return to the originating customer record. The implementation defines which events and evidence are customer appropriate, how records are matched and what happens when information is incomplete or delayed.
The connection design determines which changes can move between systems and when. It identifies the authoritative source, review required for a changed instruction or schedule, and how relevant systems receive the current agreed context. Real-time synchronization should not be assumed.
Bring the workflow: where the need begins, which systems and providers participate, what information must move, what returns after completion, and whether the experience must remain inside customer software. Signal can map the appropriate connection model.
More questions? Explore Signal FAQ →
CONNECT THE WORKFLOW
Tell Signal where the request begins, which systems or providers participate, what information needs to move, whether the experience should remain inside your software, and what must return after completion. We can map the workflow and define the right API or integration path.